The fact that there is a significant, unacceptable benefit-risk ratio for Covid-19 gene therapy injections was proven at the latest with the disclosure of the study results from the clinical trial phases. How Pfizer tricked and deceived was revealed, on the one hand, by a whistleblower (Brooke Jackson), who worked as a study coordinator for the clinical trial phases for a subcontractor (Ventavia) [13], and on the other hand, the study manipulations were revealed through viewing internal Pfizer documents made possible through court-ordered disclosure in the US, after Pfizer unsuccessfully tried to prevent this access to the records for more than 70 years. Sonja Elijah and Dr. It is thanks to Naomi Wolf, a renowned writer, political activist and former Clinton advisor, that the contents of the first 55,000 page installment [14] were made available to the public [15]. In total, the approval authorities were overwhelmed with a whopping 400,000 pages of application documents from Pfizer [16]; they had probably hoped to tie up the authorities’ time with this collection of systems and thus temporarily enable the misuse of the substances, as well as to hide the crucial data falsifications therein to prevent their discovery. This strategy has so far worked for the approval authorities, but the pharmaceutical fraudsters have significantly underestimated the meticulousness and persistence of the critical scientists and investigative journalists. The conclusion of the document review concerns inadmissible unblinding and arbitrary exclusion of study participants, which in the statistical analysis to be corrected (which was never carried out) shows complete drug failure [17], which was later confirmed in practice with exploding incidence values and hospitalization rates of “vaccinated” people [ 18], covered up deaths and serious side effects, unqualified study staff in the care of subjects, improper repositioning, formal errors, etc. And the regulatory authority involved (FDA) actively supported this. An unbelievable chain of failure from a scientific point of view, on the other hand an almost perfect interaction of organized crime. Interestingly, Pfizer revealed its knowledge of the previously described defects of the preparation under test and the consequences of its use in an annual report from March 2022 to the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). There, in the subjunctive, the financial market and investors are bluntly informed that the safety and effectiveness of the Covid-19 drug may not be proven [19]. Instead of reading the 400,000 pages of application documents, the approval authorities would only have had to read the few pages of the SEC annual report in order to temporarily stop the approval process until the necessary verifiable experimental and clinical benefit-risk evidence had been finally submitted by Pfizer. Instead, the administration of active ingredients to billions of unwitting test subjects was authorized in deliberate violation of the duty of supervision and care for consumer protection. The fact that there was no greater extent of damage may be due to a possible further perversion of the pharmaceutical mafia’s activities. When assigning the SAE (Serious Adverse Event/serious events) to the active ingredient batches, it was particularly noticeable that only some of them were particularly harmful [20], while others showed no reactions at all, not even locally at the injection site. It would therefore be entirely conceivable that the manufacturers, knowing of the enormous risk potential and the consequential damage that would then be unmistakable, delivered placebo batches (e.g. with isotonic saline solution) with which they also made further enormous profits through the higher margins compared to significantly more expensive verum preparation [21]. What is also completely unclear about the composition of the final active ingredient administration to the patient is the fact that compliance with the low-temperature cold chain (-80°C!), which is not at all possible in supply chain practice, from the manufacturer to the pharmaceutical wholesaler, to the pharmacies and up to the executing doctor, especially in the summer months [22]. Also grossly negligent for the entire development process was the ignoring of warnings by the pioneers and inventors of mRNA drug technology, Dr. Robert Malone and Dr. Luigi Warren, that this pharmacological application in humans is not yet fully developed [23]. As if all of this wasn’t unbelievable enough, consumer protection was virtually completely undermined by law through the secret introduction of the Medical Supplies Supply Guarantee Ordinance (MedBVSV), which was only issued for Covid-19 active ingredients and eliminates numerous essential quality assurance requirements of the AMG [24].
Based on these findings, the mixture of active ingredients can, in the context of the now well-documented collateral damage [25], be described as a hematological bioweapon [26] or, due to its now widespread use, as a genocide cocktail. The already mentioned EMA intervention in the approval process, with the request for clear product verification by Pfizer/BioNTech, therefore represents the decisive criterion for the final assessment of the product approval and its approval or rejection.
